CLAUDE.md is session memory, not service-driven documentation. Should not be committed to the repository.
poimen-memory
Gated recurrent memory over agent context. Reads session history chunk-by-chunk, keeps only what answers standing questions, projects result into an Obsidian vault and a pgvector index.
Status: design complete, no code yet. 37 tasks in memory-tasks/, 0 done. Start at M0.1.
Problem
Agent sessions grow faster than anyone reads them, and most of the volume is noise. One real pi session in this project:
assistant 1445
toolResult 1261 43% — ls output, file reads, mostly evidence-free
user 196
+ 8 compaction events
Compaction fires 8 times per session. Context gets discarded, not retained — root causes, decisions and gotchas evaporate when window rolls.
Mechanism
GRU-Mem (arXiv 2602.10560). Two text-controlled gates on a recurrent memory loop:
- update gate — memory only mutates when chunk contains evidence. Blocks the memory explosion that ungated recurrent memory hits.
- exit gate — stop scanning once evidence sufficient.
Paper reports up to 400% speedup and better accuracy than ungated, because unbounded memory growth degrades later updates.
sessions ─> chunk (5000 tok) ─> controller ─> gates ─> memory ─> projections
Controller emits structured output; loop acts on it:
<think> reason about chunk vs question
<check> yes|no -> U_t, update or discard
<update> candidate memory M̂_t
<next> continue|end -> E_t, exit or continue
Memory tiers
| Level | What | From | Bounded |
|---|---|---|---|
| L0 | evidence chunk, verbatim | update gate opening | no, but sparse (~17 of 412) |
| L1 | per-query memory, M_t |
gated loop over chunks | 1024 tok |
| L2 | project synthesis | gated loop over L1 memories | 1024 tok |
L2 is not new machinery — same loop, same prompt, L1 memories as input stream. Level is a parameter.
Tiers form a provenance graph. Each L1 records its L0 parents, each L2 its L1
parents. Same relation becomes both memory_edge rows and Obsidian wikilinks.
Standing queries
Update gate needs a referent. Paper's agent is φθ(Q, C_t, M_{t-1}) — gate is
defined as "does this chunk contain useful information about the problem". No
Q, no gate, and r_update becomes undefinable, which kills post-training.
So each project declares durable questions. One query = one L1 memory = one note.
# queries/poimen.yaml
project: poimen
roots: [/Users/rockliang/workplace/Poimen/agent-rust]
queries:
- id: infra-root-causes
question: What infrastructure bugs were found, what was the root cause, how was it isolated?
- id: architecture-decisions
question: What architectural decisions were made, with reasoning and rejected alternatives?
synthesis:
question: What is the current state of this project, and what should someone know before working on it?
exit_gate: true
Exit gate off at L1, on at L2. Paper §3.3 makes this call: for "what are all the X" questions you cannot know evidence is sufficient without reading everything. L1 extraction is that shape. At L2 input is a handful of memories and sufficiency is decidable. Gate still recorded at L1 — signal needed for post-training.
Authority model
JSONL log authoritative. Vault and vector index are projections.
Anything not rebuildable byte-identically from the log has hidden inputs, and that is a bug. Gate M2.8 enforces it destructively:
rm -rf vault/poimen
psql -c "delete from memory_node where project='poimen'"
mem rebuild --from-log --project poimen
git -C vault diff --exit-code # empty diff is the only pass
Buys three things: re-embedding after model change is a rebuild not a migration, Obsidian edits cannot corrupt the record, post-training corpus is the log itself.
Skills
A skill is a projection, not a level. L0/L1/L2 are descriptive — what happened. A skill is procedural — what to do next time. Gated loop does not produce it.
Format free: SKILL.md is YAML frontmatter + markdown, which is an Obsidian
note. So vault/skills/<name>/SKILL.md is both, no conversion:
pi --skill vault/skills/
ln -s .../vault/skills/<name> ~/.claude/skills/<name>
Drafts land in _drafts/, promotion is a human git mv. This is the one
cycle in the design:
emitted skill auto-loads -> appears in future transcripts
-> ingested as evidence -> reinforces the memory that emitted it
No external verifier breaks it. Two guards: _drafts/ is a directory (cannot be
globbed into --skill), and every artifact carries generated_from so ingest
tags matching chunks derived: true and refuses them as evidence.
Separate weights
Memory policy is a LoRA adapter on Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, not a fine-tuned
model. Reason is VRAM: one GPU, OLLAMA_MAX_LOADED_MODELS=2, already holding
ornith:35b + qwen2.5:3b. Separate full model evicts something, and eviction
is a weights reload measured in tens of seconds. Adapter rides the resident base.
Also: post-training emits ~50 MB, not 6 GB. Swap without redeploy. Regression reverts by pointing at previous adapter.
Ollama cannot hot-swap LoRA. Serving one needs vLLM with --enable-lora
(pattern already exists — reasoning predictor is vLLM v0.11.0). Phases M0–M4
run prompted-only, so decision is deferred, not dodged.
Layout
DESIGN.md full design, 460 lines
memory-tasks/ 37 task files + INDEX.md — tracked
crates/
mem-core/ domain types; Level; gate parser; the gated loop
mem-chunk/ RecordSource trait; ChunkPolicy; FlushTrigger
mem-llm/ gateway client — chat, embeddings, rerank
mem-ingest/ source adapters: pi sessions, claude transcripts
mem-store/ JSONL log; pgvector repo; Obsidian projector
mem-cli/ binary `mem`
queries/ standing query YAML per project
log/ JSONL event log — authoritative, tracked
vault/ Obsidian output
mem-chunk is separate and stream-shaped from day one. Sources today are files
with an EOF; telemetry or a live tail will not have one. RecordSource returns
impl Stream<Item = Record>; batch sources become streams via
futures::stream::iter, so it costs nothing now and removes a rewrite later.
Commands
mem ingest --project poimen --dry-run # chunk plan, zero model calls
mem ingest --project poimen --query infra-root-causes
mem synthesize --project poimen # L2 pass, exit gate on
mem rebuild --from-log --project poimen # drop and rebuild projections
mem verify --project poimen # provenance graph closure
mem query "why did requests over 10KB fail?"
mem skill draft --from poimen/infra-root-causes
mem label --project poimen # evidence labels for training
Verified environment facts
Checked against the running cluster, not assumed:
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| Embedding dims | 768, nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v2-moe |
| Embedding batch limit | 32 (batch size 1200 > maximum allowed batch size 32) |
| pgvector | 0.7.0 available in stock CNPG image, no custom build |
| CNPG operator | 1.30.0, declarative Database.spec.extensions |
| Ollama context cap | 32768 (OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH) — cluster-side, overrides client config |
| Controller | qwen2.5:3b-instruct — paper's exact 3B backbone |
| Gateway auth | apikey: header. Authorization: Bearer returns 401 |
| Rerank response | bare array, not {"data":[...]}; sorted by score, map back via index |
Budget fits the 32K cap: 5000 chunk + ~3200 prompt/memory + 2048 response.
Phases
Each ends in a composition gate. No phase starts until predecessor gate is green.
| Phase | Tasks | Gate asserts | |
|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | Read-only spine | 8 | third source needs no downstream change; runs offline |
| M1 | Gated loop at L1 | 8 | update-rate < 30%, memory flat not climbing |
| M2 | Projections | 8 | rebuild byte-identical from log alone |
| M3 | L2 + retrieval | 4 | hit rate ≥ 0.8, provenance precision ≥ 0.9 |
| M4 | Skills | 3 | draft not loadable; promoted skill never becomes evidence |
| M5 | Post-training | 6 | adapter beats prompted baseline on held-out project |
Update-rate is the number to watch. It is what distinguishes a gate from an expensive summarizer. Tool results are 43% of records and mostly evidence-free, so a correct gate rejects the large majority of chunks.
M0 and M2.2 need no model access and can start immediately. M5.4 (vLLM + LoRA) is homelab work independent of the rest of M5.
Reading order
- This file
- memory-tasks/INDEX.md — board, ordering rules, verification practice
- DESIGN.md — full design, schemas, risks
- Individual task files — self-contained, no DESIGN.md read required