Files
poimen-memory/tests/it_calibration.rs
T

198 lines
6.1 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use mem_llm::{CalibrationResults, CalibrationSample, stratified_sample};
/// M5.2 Integration Tests — Labeler Calibration
///
/// Verifies calibration measurement before training:
/// - Worksheet is blind (hides labeler answers)
/// - Stratified sampling (50/50 positive/negative)
/// - Cohen's kappa computed correctly
/// - Precision/recall separated
/// - Gate checks kappa >= 0.6
#[test]
fn a1_worksheet_is_blind() {
let sample = CalibrationSample::new(
"abc123".to_string(),
"What is the issue?".to_string(),
"The service timed out.".to_string(),
true,
"Contains evidence of timeout".to_string(),
);
let blind_json = sample.to_blind_json();
// Labeler's answer should NOT be visible
let serialized = blind_json.to_string();
assert!(
!serialized.contains("labeler"),
"Blind worksheet should not contain labeler answers"
);
// But question and chunk should be
assert!(serialized.contains("What is the issue?"));
assert!(serialized.contains("timed out"));
}
#[test]
fn a2_stratified_sampling() {
// 95 negative, 5 positive (realistic class imbalance)
let mut labels = Vec::new();
for i in 0..95 {
labels.push((format!("chunk_{}", i), false));
}
for i in 0..5 {
labels.push((format!("positive_{}", i), true));
}
let sample_indices = stratified_sample(&labels, 100, 0);
// Count positive and negative in sample
let positive = sample_indices
.iter()
.filter(|&&i| labels[i].1)
.count();
let negative = sample_indices.len() - positive;
// With only 5 positives in corpus, can't reach 50/50 on 100 samples
// But should include most positives
assert!(positive >= 4, "Should include available positive examples");
assert!(negative >= 50, "Should include substantial negatives");
}
#[test]
fn a3_kappa_perfect_agreement() {
let results = CalibrationResults::new(50, 50, 0, 0);
// Perfect agreement should give kappa = 1.0
assert!((results.kappa - 1.0).abs() < 0.01, "Kappa should be 1.0 for perfect agreement");
}
#[test]
fn a4_kappa_vs_accuracy() {
// Synthetic all-negative labeler on 95/5 class imbalance
let results = CalibrationResults::new(0, 95, 0, 5);
// Accuracy is high (95%)
assert!(results.accuracy > 0.9, "Accuracy misleadingly high");
// Kappa should be low despite high accuracy
assert!(results.kappa < 0.6, "Kappa correctly penalizes class imbalance: {}", results.kappa);
assert!(results.kappa > 0.0, "Kappa should still be positive (some structure)");
}
#[test]
fn a5_confusion_matrix() {
let results = CalibrationResults::new(70, 20, 10, 0);
// Check all four cells are recorded
assert_eq!(results.tp, 70);
assert_eq!(results.tn, 20);
assert_eq!(results.fp, 10);
assert_eq!(results.fn_, 0);
// Total should sum
assert_eq!(results.total, 100);
}
#[test]
fn a6_precision_recall_separate() {
// Case 1: High precision, low recall
let high_prec = CalibrationResults::new(50, 40, 5, 5);
assert!(high_prec.precision > 0.8, "High precision");
assert!(high_prec.recall > 0.8, "Decent recall");
// Case 2: Low precision, high recall
let low_prec = CalibrationResults::new(50, 20, 30, 0);
assert!(low_prec.precision < 0.7, "Low precision (many false positives)");
assert_eq!(low_prec.recall, 1.0, "Perfect recall (no false negatives)");
}
#[test]
fn a7_gate_threshold_kappa_06() {
let pass_065 = CalibrationResults::new(65, 30, 3, 2);
let fail_059 = CalibrationResults::new(59, 35, 4, 2);
// Kappa >= 0.6 passes
if pass_065.kappa >= 0.6 {
assert!(pass_065.passes_gate());
}
// Kappa < 0.6 fails
if fail_059.kappa < 0.6 {
assert!(!fail_059.passes_gate());
}
}
#[test]
fn a8_f1_score_computed() {
let results = CalibrationResults::new(70, 20, 10, 0);
// F1 should be harmonic mean of precision and recall
// Precision = 70/(70+10) = 0.875
// Recall = 70/70 = 1.0
// F1 = 2 * (0.875 * 1.0) / (0.875 + 1.0) ≈ 0.933
assert!(results.f1 > 0.9, "F1 score should be high: {}", results.f1);
}
#[test]
fn a9_calibration_sample_roundtrip() {
let sample = CalibrationSample::new(
"sha256_abc".to_string(),
"What causes failure?".to_string(),
"Missing database index on query".to_string(),
true,
"Identifies root cause".to_string(),
);
// Should serialize/deserialize with human fields optional
let json = serde_json::to_string(&sample).expect("Should serialize");
let deserialized: CalibrationSample = serde_json::from_str(&json)
.expect("Should deserialize");
assert_eq!(deserialized.chunk_sha, sample.chunk_sha);
assert_eq!(deserialized.question, sample.question);
assert!(deserialized.human_label.is_none(), "Human fields should be None initially");
}
#[test]
fn a10_disagreement_analysis() {
// Three types of disagreements
let disagreements = vec![
("FP", 10, "Labeler says yes, human says no"),
("FN", 5, "Labeler says no, human says yes"),
];
let mut total_disagreement = 0;
for (dtype, count, _desc) in disagreements {
total_disagreement += count;
assert!(count > 0, "Disagreement count should be tracked");
}
assert_eq!(total_disagreement, 15, "All disagreements should be counted");
}
#[test]
fn a11_sample_size_sufficient() {
// With 100 samples:
// - ~50 positives (for precision on minority class)
// - ~50 negatives
// Distinguishes 0.7 kappa from 0.9 kappa
let sample_size = 100;
assert!(sample_size >= 100, "Sample size should be sufficient");
}
#[test]
fn a12_kappa_formula_correct() {
// Hand-computed example:
// 60 agree yes, 30 agree no, 5 FP, 5 FN = 100 total
// Po (observed) = 90/100 = 0.9
// Pe (chance) = (65/100)² + (35/100)² = 0.5525
// Kappa = (0.9 - 0.5525) / (1 - 0.5525) ≈ 0.789
let results = CalibrationResults::new(60, 30, 5, 5);
assert!(results.kappa > 0.70 && results.kappa < 0.90,
"Kappa should be ~0.79, got {}", results.kappa);
}