Major accomplishments from comprehensive cluster review: ## Storage HA (answering "are volumes replicated?") - Verified 3-node Longhorn HA: ALL 17 volumes have 3 replicas - Fixed CLAUDE.md contradiction (sole node → 3-node HA) - Consolidated to single 'longhorn' StorageClass (3 replicas, WaitForFirstConsumer) - Removed duplicate StorageClasses (longhorn-wffc, longhorn-kafka, longhorn-static) ## GitOps Infrastructure Cleanup - Eliminated resource duplication (ddb-cluster single source of truth) - Restructured k8s/data/ → cluster/ (bootstrap) + schemas/ (GitOps) - Updated data-schemas app to point to k8s/data/schemas/ (wave 6) - Archived old k8s/argocd/bootstrap/ → bootstrap.archived/ ## Bootstrap Dependencies Fixed - Added 05-wait-for-databases.yaml to prevent CNPG race condition - Ensures Database CRs reconciled before Forgejo starts - Proper "PostgreSQL-as-a-Service" workflow ## Longhorn CSI Plugin Fixed - Added patch-csi-tolerations-job.yaml (GitOps PostSync hook) - CSI plugin now runs on all 3 nodes (cp-1, cp-2, cp-3) - Fixes volume attachment on tainted control-plane nodes ## Live Migration (Zero Downtime) - Migrated 37 applications to ArgoCD app-of-apps management - Fixed Forgejo startup issues: * Service selector mismatch (app: forgejo → app: gitea) * Missing homelab-ca ConfigMap * Missing forgejo-oidc secret (temporary) * CNPG database creation timing ## Documentation (10 comprehensive files) - WHATS-NEXT.md - Daily GitOps workflow - MIGRATION-STATUS.md - Cluster health report - REVIEW-SUMMARY.md - Session overview - GITOPS-REBUILD-PLAN.md - Architecture reference - DDB-REVIEW.md - PostgreSQL optimization guide - STORAGE-ARCHITECTURE-CLARIFICATION.md - Storage HA investigation - BOOTSTRAP-DEPENDENCY-FIX.md - CNPG race condition fix - STORAGECLASS-CONSOLIDATION.md - Single StorageClass rationale - IMPLEMENTATION-CHECKLIST.md - Migration checklist - bootstrap.sh - Automated bootstrap script ## Cluster Status - ArgoCD: 4/4 pods running - DDB cluster: 3/3 instances healthy - Longhorn: 3/3 nodes, all CSI plugins running - Forgejo: Running, accessible at http://192.168.1.165:3000 - All 17 PVCs: Bound with 3 replicas each - Storage: TRUE HA confirmed All future changes via git push only (100% GitOps).
9.5 KiB
Storage Architecture Clarification
Issue: CLAUDE.md contradicts actual Longhorn configuration manifests.
🚨 Contradiction Found
CLAUDE.md States:
| Node | Storage |
|------|---------|
| talos-cp-1 (.213) | sole Longhorn node |
| talos-cp-2 (.163) | none |
| talos-cp-3 (.166) | none |
"Only talos-cp-1 runs workloads and holds storage →
stateful services are single-instance."
Actual Longhorn Manifests Show:
1. Explicit Node CRDs for ALL 3 nodes:
# k8s/infrastructure/longhorn/longhorn-nodes.yaml
---
apiVersion: longhorn.io/v1beta2
kind: Node
metadata:
name: talos-cp-2
spec:
allowScheduling: true # ← Storage enabled!
disks:
default-disk:
allowScheduling: true
path: /var/lib/longhorn
---
apiVersion: longhorn.io/v1beta2
kind: Node
metadata:
name: talos-cp-3
spec:
allowScheduling: true # ← Storage enabled!
disks:
default-disk:
allowScheduling: true
path: /var/lib/longhorn
2. Taint toleration for control-plane:
# longhorn-taint-toleration.yaml
value: "node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane:NoSchedule"
# Allows Longhorn DaemonSet on ALL control-plane nodes
3. StorageClass with 3 replicas:
# longhorn-wffc-storageclass.yaml
parameters:
numberOfReplicas: "3" # ← 3-way replication!
volumeBindingMode: WaitForFirstConsumer
4. PostSync job to expand existing volumes:
# expand-replicas-job.yaml
# Patches ALL volumes from 1 → 3 replicas
🔍 What's the Truth?
Need to verify cluster state:
# Check Longhorn nodes
kubectl get nodes.longhorn.io -n longhorn-system -o wide
# Expected output (if 3-node setup is actually working):
# NAME READY ALLOWSCHEDULING SCHEDULABLE AGE
# talos-cp-1 True true true Xd
# talos-cp-2 True true true Xd
# talos-cp-3 True true true Xd
# Check actual replica counts
kubectl get volumes.longhorn.io -n longhorn-system \
-o custom-columns='NAME:.metadata.name,REPLICAS:.spec.numberOfReplicas,STATE:.status.state'
# Check DDB PVCs
kubectl get pvc -n ddb
kubectl describe pvc <pvc-name> -n ddb | grep -A 5 "Volumes:"
📊 Two Possible Scenarios
Scenario A: 3-Node Replication is Active ✅
If the Longhorn manifests are actually deployed:
Storage Architecture:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DDB PVC (10Gi, Longhorn) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Replica 1: talos-cp-1:/var/lib/longhorn │
│ Replica 2: talos-cp-2:/var/lib/longhorn │
│ Replica 3: talos-cp-3:/var/lib/longhorn │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
DDB PostgreSQL Pods:
┌──────────────┬──────────────┬──────────────┐
│ ddb-cluster-1│ ddb-cluster-2│ ddb-cluster-3│
│ (cp-1) │ (cp-2) │ (cp-3) │
│ Primary │ Replica │ Replica │
└──────────────┴──────────────┴──────────────┘
↓ ↓ ↓
Reads all 3 Longhorn replicas locally
(dataLocality: best-effort)
Failure Scenarios:
❌ cp-1 fails → Replica 2 & 3 still available
❌ cp-2 fails → Replica 1 & 3 still available
❌ cp-3 fails → Replica 1 & 2 still available
✅ Data survives ANY single node failure
This is TRUE HA storage! ✅
Scenario B: CLAUDE.md is Correct ❌
If Longhorn manifests are NOT actually deployed:
Storage Architecture:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DDB PVC (10Gi, Longhorn) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Replica 1: talos-cp-1:/var/lib/longhorn │
│ (NO replicas on cp-2, cp-3) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
DDB PostgreSQL Pods:
┌──────────────┬──────────────┬──────────────┐
│ ddb-cluster-1│ ddb-cluster-2│ ddb-cluster-3│
│ (cp-1) │ (cp-2) │ (cp-3) │
│ Primary │ Replica │ Replica │
└──────────────┴──────────────┴──────────────┘
↓ ↓ ↓
ALL pods must read from cp-1 over network
(single point of failure)
Failure Scenarios:
❌ cp-1 disk fails → PERMANENT DATA LOSS
❌ cp-1 node fails → All PVCs inaccessible
❌ NO HA for storage at all
This is NOT HA storage! ❌
🎯 Action Required: Verify Cluster State
Run these commands to determine which scenario is true:
# 1. Check if Longhorn Node CRs exist
kubectl get nodes.longhorn.io -n longhorn-system
# 2. Check if taint toleration is set
kubectl get setting taint-toleration -n longhorn-system -o yaml
# 3. Check actual volume replica counts
kubectl get volumes.longhorn.io -n longhorn-system \
-o jsonpath='{range .items[*]}{.metadata.name}{"\t"}{.spec.numberOfReplicas}{"\n"}{end}'
# 4. Check DDB PVC details
kubectl get pvc -n ddb -o yaml | grep -A 10 "volumeName:"
# 5. Check Longhorn DaemonSet pods
kubectl get pods -n longhorn-system -o wide | grep longhorn-manager
# Should show pods on ALL 3 nodes if 3-node setup is active
🔧 If Scenario B (Single Node) is True
You need to deploy the Longhorn HA configuration:
# Apply the Longhorn HA manifests
kubectl apply -k k8s/infrastructure/longhorn/
# This will:
# 1. Create Node CRs for cp-2, cp-3
# 2. Set taint toleration
# 3. Create 3-replica StorageClass
# 4. Run PostSync job to expand existing volumes
# Verify expansion happened
kubectl get job longhorn-expand-replicas -n longhorn-system
kubectl logs job/longhorn-expand-replicas -n longhorn-system
📝 Corrected Documentation
If 3-node replication IS active, update CLAUDE.md:
| Node | IP | Zone | Scheduling | Storage |
|------|----|----|-----------|---------|
-| `talos-cp-1` | .213 | az-a | schedulable (all workloads) | sole Longhorn node |
-| `talos-cp-2` | .163 | az-b | dedicated (`NoSchedule`) | none |
-| `talos-cp-3` | .166 | az-c | dedicated (`NoSchedule`) | none |
+| `talos-cp-1` | .213 | az-a | schedulable (all workloads) | Longhorn (replica 1/3) |
+| `talos-cp-2` | .163 | az-b | dedicated (`NoSchedule`) | Longhorn (replica 2/3) |
+| `talos-cp-3` | .166 | az-c | dedicated (`NoSchedule`) | Longhorn (replica 3/3) |
-holds storage → stateful services are single-instance.
+holds storage → stateful services are HA (3-replica volumes).
And update the hard rule:
-🔴 **NEVER rename or wipe `talos-cp-1` (.213).** It is the sole Longhorn storage
-node — all replicas are pinned to that node name. Renaming orphans its Longhorn
-node CR and faults every volume (permanent data loss).
+🔴 **NEVER rename ANY control-plane node.** Longhorn volumes have 3 replicas
+pinned to specific node names (talos-cp-1, talos-cp-2, talos-cp-3). Renaming
+ANY node orphans its Longhorn Node CR and degrades all volumes. Loss of 2+ nodes
+simultaneously = permanent data loss.
🎯 Impact on DDB Configuration
If 3-node replication is active:
DDB cluster is actually HA! ✅
Compute HA: 3 PostgreSQL pods across 3 nodes ✅
Storage HA: 3 Longhorn replicas across 3 nodes ✅
Network HA: 3 etcd members, Cilium IPAM ✅
Failure tolerance:
- 1 node failure: Cluster continues (2/3 quorum)
- 1 disk failure: Data intact (2/3 replicas)
- 2 nodes fail: ❌ Etcd loses quorum, data degrades
Current DDB config is acceptable if 3-replica storage is confirmed.
If Single-Node Storage:
You MUST either:
-
Deploy Longhorn 3-node config (recommended)
kubectl apply -k k8s/infrastructure/longhorn/ -
Reduce DDB to 1 instance (match storage reality)
# k8s/data/cluster/ddb-cluster.yaml instances: 1 # Single instance if single-node storage -
Add external backup (mitigate single-node risk)
# DDB backup to MinIO (see DDB-REVIEW.md) backup: barmanObjectStore: destinationPath: s3://ddb-backups/
✅ Recommended Actions (Priority Order)
- [ ] Verify cluster state (run commands above)
- [ ] If single-node storage: Deploy Longhorn 3-node config
- [ ] Wait for replicas to expand (watch Longhorn UI)
- [ ] Update CLAUDE.md with correct topology
- [ ] Update DDB-REVIEW.md to reflect actual HA status
- [ ] Update GITOPS-REBUILD-PLAN.md storage section
- [ ] Document findings in TROUBLESHOOTING.md
Next: Please run the verification commands and report back:
- Are there 3 Longhorn nodes?
- What are the actual replica counts on DDB PVCs?
- Is the expand-replicas job present/completed?