Compare commits

...
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
rock 7bdc8b2de2 fix(llm-serving): set runtimeClassName nvidia on the candle deployment
Without it the container runs under runc, libcuda.so is never injected and
candle-vllm panics in cudarc at startup. The pod reached Running but crashed
on every restart.

Verified live: pod Ready, coder-predictor endpoints populated, /v1/models
reports coder-14b-fp16 and a completion returns OK.
2026-11-05 09:22:48 +08:00
rock f6fca4705b feat(llm-serving): run coder as fp16 14B across two V100s
Replace the GPTQ W4A16 30B-A3B coder with Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct at
fp16 on TP=2.

The V100 has FP16 tensor cores and no INT4 ones, so the 4-bit path paid a
dequantisation pass on the SM. Profiling showed SM at 98% with the memory
controller at 19%, and the batch-1 step cost matched a full-model read.
Same harness, 16 streams: ITL 71.5 -> 39.7 ms, 215 -> 287 tok/s.

The deployment keeps the candle-vllm name and the app: candle-vllm label,
so coder-service.yaml and every client keep working unchanged.
2026-11-05 09:11:46 +08:00
rock db97159905 feat(llm-serving): run clef-serve so /v1/systemone answers
clef-serve was parked at 0 while candle-vllm took a card. worker-1 holds
four V100s, so the coder takes one and clef takes one, leaving two free
for a TP=2 candle run.

The gateway already routes the clef-flash model to clef-serve:80 on
/v1/systemone, so this single replica count is what turns that route on.
2026-11-04 18:59:56 +08:00
rock 67760720fc k8s(llm-serving): client-facing Service for candle-vllm coder
Creates coder-predictor selecting app=candle-vllm on ports 80 and 8080, so
clients keep one stable host name across the vLLM -> candle-vllm handoff and
only this selector changes from now on.

The retired KTML predictor requested two V100s and never reached Ready.
2026-11-04 18:59:56 +08:00
4 changed files with 165 additions and 11 deletions
+9 -11
View File
@@ -33,19 +33,17 @@ metadata:
app: clef-serve app: clef-serve
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: llm-serving app.kubernetes.io/part-of: llm-serving
spec: spec:
# Parked at 0 to free the only V100 that was not serving anything, so candle-vllm can # One card. worker-1 holds four V100s: candle-vllm takes one for the coder, and
# run its Phase 0 on one card. All four cards were allocated (coder 2, reasoning 1, # this pod takes one, so two stay free for a TP=2 candle run.
# this 1) and a new GPU workload had nowhere to land.
# #
# This is the only GPU consumer in the namespace that is not vLLM, which is why it is # Enabled 2026-11-04 to serve /v1/systemone, which the gateway already routes to
# the first card released: the standing instruction is to keep the vLLM pods healthy # this Service. It was parked at 0 while candle-vllm was brought up on the same
# until candle-vllm answers, and this pod is not one of them. # cards, and it served no inference request between 2026-10-30T06:23:40Z and then.
# #
# It was serving nothing. The last 30 log lines at park time were 30/30 kubelet # Cold start is about four minutes: the pod pip-installs on every boot because the
# /health probes and no inference request since start (2026-10-30T06:23:40Z). Nothing # torch base image cannot be pushed to the registry (Cloudflare answers 413 above
# in git selects this service. Restore it once the rollout leaves a card free: # 100 MB per layer). startupProbe allows for that.
# 30B-A3B takes 1, Coder-Next TP=2 takes 2, so card 4 is this one. replicas: 1
replicas: 0
# Recreate, not RollingUpdate. Every GPU card is allocated, so a rolling update leaves # Recreate, not RollingUpdate. Every GPU card is allocated, so a rolling update leaves
# the new pod Pending forever waiting for a card the old pod still holds. # the new pod Pending forever waiting for a card the old pod still holds.
strategy: strategy:
+106
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
# Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct, fp16, tensor-parallel across two V100s.
#
# Why this model and this precision. The previous workload was Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B
# in GPTQ W4A16 on one V100. Profiling that deployment showed SM utilisation at
# 98% while the memory controller sat at 19%: the V100 has FP16 tensor cores and
# no INT4 ones, so every decode step ran a dequantisation pass on the SM. That is
# a hardware-generation mismatch, not a tunable. Sequence throughput matches the
# arithmetic: at batch 1 the step cost equalled a full-model read (17.6 ms against
# 15 GB / 900 GB/s = 16.7 ms) while the routed experts alone are ~1.5 GB.
#
# Measured on this hardware, same harness, same 16-stream load:
#
# GPTQ W4A16 30B-A3B, TP=1 : ITL 71.5 ms, 215 tok/s aggregate
# fp16 14B, TP=2 : ITL 39.7 ms, 287 tok/s aggregate
#
# The dense model degrades only 1.4x from 1 to 16 streams (27.9 -> 39.7 ms) while
# the MoE degrades 4.1x (17.6 -> 71.5 ms), because a dense model reads its weights
# once per step and amortises across the batch. The MoE pays expert weight traffic
# per sequence. Single-stream latency is the one case where the MoE still wins
# (17.6 ms against 27.9 ms), since it activates ~3B parameters per token.
#
# TP=2 notes that cost time to establish, so they are recorded here:
# - Sharding needs no code change. Every dimension divides by 2: attention heads
# 40 -> 20, KV heads 8 -> 4, intermediate_size 13824 -> 6912, vocab
# 152064 -> 76032. Verify this first for any replacement model.
# - TP=2 on a GPTQ checkpoint is what crashed (CUDA_ERROR_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS in
# forward()) on the previous model. The cause was quantised weight sharding
# and the g_idx guard in src/openai/models/linear.rs, not TP itself. A dense
# fp16 checkpoint has no g_idx, no packed weights and no scales, so it takes
# the plain column/row-parallel path and the crash does not reproduce.
# - These are V100-PCIE cards with no NVLink, so every layer's all-reduce
# crosses PCIe. It shows up in TTFT (275 ms at 1 stream, 1090 ms at 16)
# more than in ITL.
# - KV capacity is 11635 MB per rank, about 59K context tokens. The fp16
# weights consume the room the KV pool would otherwise use. This is well
# short of the 256K the previous model targeted, and it is the price of
# leaving the dequantisation path.
#
# Weights must be in the PVC as /mnt/models/coder-14b-fp16 (28 GB, 6 shards).
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: candle-vllm
namespace: llm-serving
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: llm-serving
app: candle-vllm
spec:
replicas: 1
strategy:
# One replica holds both GPUs, so a rolling update would need a second pair.
# Recreate keeps the rollout to a single weights load.
type: Recreate
selector:
matchLabels:
app: candle-vllm
template:
metadata:
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: llm-serving
app: candle-vllm
spec:
# Required. Without this the container runs under runc, libcuda.so is never
# injected, and candle-vllm panics in cudarc at startup with
# "Unable to dynamically load the cuda shared library".
runtimeClassName: nvidia
containers:
- name: candle
image: forgejo.riotpiao.com/riotpiao-poimen/candle-vllm:sm70-gptq-slim
command: ["/usr/local/bin/candle-vllm"]
# fp16, not GPTQ, and two ranks, not one. See the header for the
# measurements and the TP=2 findings.
args:
- --w
- /mnt/models/coder-14b-fp16
- --d
- 0,1
- --dtype
- f16
- --p
- "8080"
- --max-num-seqs
- "32"
# 11.6 GB of KV per rank, about 59K context tokens. The fp16 weights
# leave no room for more.
- --kv-fraction
- "0.85"
ports:
- containerPort: 8080
resources:
limits:
cpu: "8"
memory: 36Gi
nvidia.com/gpu: "2"
requests:
cpu: "4"
memory: 12Gi
nvidia.com/gpu: "2"
volumeMounts:
- name: models
mountPath: /mnt/models
readOnly: true
volumes:
- name: models
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: llm-models
+40
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
# Stable client-facing name for the coder chat model, deliberately decoupled
# from the process that serves it.
#
# poimen-memory addresses a Service, not a pod and not an InferenceService. The
# vLLM -> candle-vllm handoff therefore changes this file's selector and nothing
# else, so the client config never changes again and there is no window in which
# the host name is wrong.
#
# The previous KTML predictor requested two V100s and never reached Ready, so it
# held half the GPU pool while serving nothing. candle-vllm replaces it.
#
# Two ports on purpose:
# - 80 matches every other predictor Service in this namespace, and matches
# a client base URL that carries no port number.
# - 8080 is the container port. Publishing it directly avoids a port
# translation that is easy to get wrong in a curl.
#
# Do not delete and recreate this Service: a delete drops the ClusterIP, and a
# client that cached the name during the gap fails until it re-resolves.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: coder-predictor
namespace: llm-serving
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: llm-serving
app: coder-predictor
spec:
type: ClusterIP
selector:
app: candle-vllm
ports:
- name: http
protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 8080
- name: http-8080
protocol: TCP
port: 8080
targetPort: 8080
+10
View File
@@ -13,9 +13,19 @@ resources:
# clef-flash runs through clef-serve.yaml, not through an SGLang runtime. SGLang needs # clef-flash runs through clef-serve.yaml, not through an SGLang runtime. SGLang needs
# v0.5.22+, published only on CUDA 13, and CUDA 13 dropped Volta kernels. The model # v0.5.22+, published only on CUDA 13, and CUDA 13 dropped Volta kernels. The model
# instead runs the implementation it ships (joint_schema_model.py) in fp16 on one V100. # instead runs the implementation it ships (joint_schema_model.py) in fp16 on one V100.
# coder-14b-fp16.yaml owns the `candle-vllm` Deployment name and the
# `app: candle-vllm` label that coder-service.yaml selects. It must be the only
# workload with that label, or the Service splits traffic across two models.
#
# fp16 on two V100s, not GPTQ on one: measured 39.7 ms ITL and 287 tok/s at 16
# streams against 71.5 ms and 215 tok/s for the 4-bit MoE. The V100 has FP16
# tensor cores and no INT4 ones, so 4-bit pays dequantisation on the SM while
# the memory controller idles at 19%.
- coder-14b-fp16.yaml
- clef-serve.yaml - clef-serve.yaml
# Stable client-facing name for the chat model. poimen-memory points at this Service, # Stable client-facing name for the chat model. poimen-memory points at this Service,
# so the vLLM -> candle-vllm handoff is a selector edit here and no client change. # so the vLLM -> candle-vllm handoff is a selector edit here and no client change.
- coder-service.yaml
- reasoning-long-service.yaml - reasoning-long-service.yaml
# ornith is retired: its InferenceService still reports Ready=True while running zero # ornith is retired: its InferenceService still reports Ready=True while running zero
# replicas, because desired equals available at 0. Its manifest was never committed, # replicas, because desired equals available at 0. Its manifest was never committed,