Compare commits
1
Commits
d821718375
...
main
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
ce4434286c |
@@ -134,12 +134,31 @@ ingress:
|
||||
# wildcard. The wildcard covers this host.
|
||||
|
||||
# Resources
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The 1000m ceiling throttled Gitea badly. Measured on a running pod:
|
||||
# nr_throttled 189528 of 1169014 CFS periods (16.2%)
|
||||
# throttled_usec 4424898602 us (~74 minutes lost)
|
||||
# actual usage 951m against the 1000m limit
|
||||
# The visible symptom was slow Actions traffic: FetchTask took 3469.9ms and
|
||||
# repository compare endpoints took 3091-3811ms, so runners timed out and
|
||||
# retried, which added more load to an already saturated process.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The database was never the bottleneck. A real action_runner UPDATE measured
|
||||
# 2.133ms with zero lock waits, so this is CPU starvation in Gitea itself.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# requests.cpu rises to 750m because a request below real usage earns the pod
|
||||
# little scheduling weight during contention. limits.cpu rises to 3000m
|
||||
# because diff computation is bursty and needs room to run without throttling.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Caution: this pod runs on talos-cp-3, a control-plane node. 3000m is 25% of
|
||||
# that node's 11950m allocatable CPU. If Gitea sustains near this limit, move
|
||||
# the workload off the control plane rather than raising the limit again.
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
requests:
|
||||
cpu: 200m
|
||||
memory: 512Mi
|
||||
cpu: 750m
|
||||
memory: 768Mi
|
||||
limits:
|
||||
cpu: 1000m
|
||||
cpu: 3000m
|
||||
memory: 2Gi
|
||||
|
||||
# Tolerations for control-plane
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user